Differenze

Queste sono le differenze tra la revisione selezionata e la versione attuale della pagina.

--- digitalhealth:0011a [10/07/2024 alle 11:18 (2 anni fa)] – creata Susanna Pelagatti
+++ digitalhealth:0011a [22/04/2026 alle 04:48 (3 mesi fa)] (versione attuale) – Susanna Pelagatti
@@ Linea 1: / Linea 1: @@
-====== Assistive Technologies ======
+====== 0011a: Assistive Technologies ======
+===== Practical Info =====
+  * Please look at [[https://unipi.coursecatalogue.cineca.it/|this site]] for the purpose, the recommended prerequisites, and the program.
+  * Course coordinator: [[https://pages.di.unipi.it/stefanochessa/ | Stefano Chessa ]] Co-instructors: [[https://unimap.unipi.it/cercapersone/dettaglio.php?ri=4717 | Susanna Pelagatti]],  [[https://unimap.unipi.it/cercapersone/dettaglio.php?ri=153742/|Barbara Leporini]] e [[https://www.unipi.it/ateneo/organizzazione/persone/marco-righi-116098/|Marco Righi]].
+  * Office hours (ricevimento): by appointment (to be arranged via email)
+  * Course schedule: Tuesday 4:00–6:00 PM and Friday 9:00–11:00 AM (Room C1)
+===== Teaching materials =====
+See the [[0011a:lezioni25-26| lectures and exercises]] section
+The teaching material of Prof. Leporini is available on Classroom with the code **dytxook**
+[[https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1VHyry-woVJTRZfbC2Wu4RUjQoVvPB9v3?usp=drive_link|Slide Repository]]
+===== Assessment Methods =====
+The exam consists of the preparation of a **didactic project** or a **review of a topic** and an **oral examination**.
+==== Project ====
+The project must be developed using the tools and the methodologies presented during the course or suggested by the teachers. It must be accompanied by a written report explaining its motivations, design choices and structure.
+Both the project (including code, if applicable) and the report must be submitted by email to the teachers and will be evaluated prior to admission to the oral exam.
+Students will be admitted to the oral exam only if the project meets the minimum score requirements (18/30).
+====Systematic Review Option====
+Students who choose the review option must:
+  * agree on the topic with the instructor
+  * conduct a systematic literature review following the PRISMA methodology
+The review must be accompanied by a written report that:
+  * clearly defines the research questions
+  * describes the review methodology
+  * presents and discusses the main findings
+  * explicitly answers the research questions based on the analyzed literature
+Students will be admitted to the oral exam only if the written document meets the minimum score requirements (18/30).
+====Oral Examination====
+The oral exam consists of:
+  * a presentation of the work done using slides (15–20 minutes)
+  * a discussion with the instructor
+During the discussion, the student will be asked to:
+  * explain and justify the design choices made
+  * solve simple practical problems using the technologies presented in the course
+  * discuss the main theoretical concepts covered in the course
+The exam will not be passed if the student:
+  * is unable to adequately justify design decisions or statements on the review
+  * cannot select appropriate technologies to address accessibility issues
+  * fails to connect different concepts from the course when answering questions
+====Final Evaluation====
+The final grade will be based on:
+  * the quality of the project/written review
+  * the clarity and effectiveness of the presentation
+  * the performance in the oral examination